ROOFING FELT VS. TAR PAPER: UNDERSTANDING THE UNDERLAYMENT OPTIONS FOR YOUR ROOF

Roofing Felt vs. Tar Paper: Understanding the Underlayment Options for Your Roof

Roofing Felt vs. Tar Paper: Understanding the Underlayment Options for Your Roof

Blog Article

While often used interchangeably, roofing felt and tar paper are not exactly the same. Both serve as crucial underlayment materials for your roof, providing an extra layer of protection between the shingles and the roof deck. However, there are key differences in their composition, performance, and suitability for your project. This guide dives deep into the world of roofing felt vs. tar paper, helping you make an informed decision for your next roof installation or replacement.


Unveiling the Composition: Roofing Felt vs. Tar Paper




  • Roofing Felt: Primarily composed of organic materials like recycled paper products, roofing felt is impregnated with asphalt to enhance its water resistance. Some felt underlayment variations feature asphalt coating only on the outer layers, while others boast complete saturation. Traditionally, roofing felt came in two weight categories: 15-pound felt (per 100 square feet) and 30-pound felt, offering varying levels of thickness and durability.




  • Tar Paper: Less commonly used nowadays, tar paper is constructed from a tear-resistant base, often natural fibers or fiberglass matting, saturated with tar. While offering some waterproofing capabilities, tar itself is not as effective as asphalt in what does interior design do.




Understanding the Performance Trade-offs


Both roofing felt and tar paper offer some level of protection, but they differ in their performance characteristics:





  • Water Resistance: Both materials are treated to repel water, but roofing felt generally boasts superior water resistance due to the use of asphalt. Asphalt offers better adhesion and flexibility compared to tar, creating a more robust barrier against moisture infiltration.




  • Durability: Modern roofing felt, especially thicker variants like 30-pound felt, offers better resistance to tears, punctures, and UV degradation compared to tar paper. Tar paper tends to be more brittle and susceptible to weather damage over time.




  • Weight: Roofing felt is lighter than tar paper, making it easier for roofers to handle and install. This translates to faster installation times and potentially lower labor costs.




  • Breatheability: Both materials allow some level of vapor transmission, which is crucial for preventing moisture buildup underneath the shingles. However, some synthetic underlayment options, gaining popularity in recent times, offer superior breathability.




  • Fire Resistance: Asphalt-impregnated roofing felt can contribute to a slightly improved fire rating for your roof compared to tar paper.




Considering the Downsides: Weaknesses of Roofing Felt and Tar Paper


While offering valuable protection, both roofing felt and tar paper have limitations:





  • Susceptibility to Mold and Mildew: Organic components in roofing felt can be susceptible to mold and mildew growth in humid environments.




  • Limited Lifespan: Both roofing felt and tar paper have a shorter lifespan compared to some modern synthetic underlayment options. They may need to be replaced sooner during a roof tear-off.




  • Environmental Considerations: Production of asphalt-based roofing felt might raise some environmental concerns compared to newer, eco-friendly underlayment materials.




Modern Alternatives: Stepping Beyond Roofing Felt and Tar Paper


Advancements in roofing technology have introduced innovative underlayment options beyond traditional roofing felt and tar paper:





  • Synthetic Underlayment: Composed of non-woven synthetic fibers like polypropylene, synthetic underlayment offers superior tear resistance, water resistance, and breathability compared to felt and tar paper. Additionally, they are lightweight, easier to install, and boast a longer lifespan.




  • Rubberized Asphalt Underlayment: This advanced underlayment combines asphalt with a rubberized membrane, offering exceptional waterproofing capabilities, flexibility, and resistance to extreme temperatures. It's particularly well-suited for areas prone to heavy rain or snow.




Choosing the Right Underlayment: A Guide for Homeowners


The optimal underlayment choice depends on various factors, including your budget, climate, roof pitch, and shingle type. Here's a breakdown to help you decide:





  • For Budget-Conscious Projects: If cost is a primary concern, roofing felt can be a viable option, especially for simple roof designs in moderate climates.




  • Prioritizing Durability and Performance: For enhanced performance and a longer lifespan, consider synthetic underlayment, particularly in regions with harsh weather conditions.




  • Steep Roof Pitch or Heavy Precipitation: Rubberized asphalt underlayment offers the best defense against water infiltration on steep roofs or in areas with significant rainfall or snowfall.




Consulting a Roofing Professional:


For the most informed decision, consulting a qualified roofing contractor is highly recommended. They can assess your specific roof requirements and recommend the most suitable underlayment option based on your project's needs and budget.


In conclusion, while roofing felt and tar paper have served their purpose historically, they are gradually being surpassed by more advanced underlayment materials. By understanding the strengths and weaknesses of

Report this page